In terms of speech delivery, both Dananjaya Hettiarachchi and Mohammed Qahtani display effective use of body language and voice. They both understand the importance of using these tools to engage and captivate their audience. However, there are subtle differences in their delivery styles that set them apart.
Hettiarachchi uses a dynamic and energetic approach in his delivery. His body language is expressive and animated, using hand gestures and facial expressions to emphasize his points. He moves around the stage confidently, engaging with different sections of the audience and creating a sense of connection. His voice is also vibrant and powerful, fluctuating in pitch and volume to convey his emotions and create impact. Overall, Hettiarachchi's delivery is dynamic and captivating, leaving a lasting impression on the audience.
Qahtani, on the other hand, adopts a more composed and controlled delivery style. His body language is calm and measured, using subtle gestures and movements to enhance his message. He maintains a steady posture throughout his speech, giving off an air of professionalism and confidence. Qahtani's voice is smooth and soothing, with a steady rhythm and tone that draws the audience in. Although his delivery may appear more restrained compared to Hettiarachchi, it still effectively conveys his message and keeps the audience engaged.
In terms of effectiveness, Hettiarachchi's more dynamic delivery style tends to leave a stronger impact on the audience. His energetic body language and powerful voice create a sense of excitement and enthusiasm, making it easier for the audience to connect with his message. While Qahtani's delivery is also effective, it may be perceived as slightly more reserved, which may not have the same level of immediate impact.
Both speakers demonstrate a strong command of their voice, using variations in tone, pace, and volume to effectively convey their messages. However, one possible criticism of Hettiarachchi's delivery is that at times, his enthusiasm and use of vocal power may overshadow the content of his speech. It is important for him to strike a balance between delivering a compelling performance and ensuring that the audience is fully grasping the substance of his message.
In terms of dress code and general appearance, both speakers present themselves professionally and appropriately for the context of their speeches. Hettiarachchi appears more casual, wearing a collared shirt and trousers, which contributes to his energetic and dynamic approach. Qahtani, on the other hand, presents a more formal appearance with a suit, reflecting his composed and measured delivery style. Both speakers' appearances align with their overall delivery styles and contribute to the overall impression they leave on the audience.
Overall, while both Dananjaya Hettiarachchi and Mohammed Qahtani demonstrate effective use of body language and voice in their delivery, Hettiarachchi's more dynamic approach tends to have a stronger impact on the audience. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of their delivery styles may vary depending on the audience and context of the speech.
Speech 1:"i see something". Dananjaya Hettiarachchi Speech 2: "the power of words".Mohammed Qahtani
Category 3: Overall Effectiveness/Impact of Each Address (20 marks
Category 5: The Delivery – Body Language and Voice (20 marks)
Compare the two speakers in terms of speech delivery (use of body language and voice).
You must write two paragraphs (1.5 line spacing in Arial font).
Length of paragraph: not shorter than 250 words and no longer than 300 words.
• Your paragraphs should not be written in bullet form. Write topic sentences, support sentences and closing sentences.
• Important: You must not discuss one speaker in paragraph one and then the next speaker in paragraph two. You need to synthesise your comparisons in both paragraphs.
Consider the following aspects before you write your response:
• Which speaker is more effective and why?
• Overall effective use of voice and body language - motivate your answer.
• Is there anything you would criticise regarding the use of the speakers’ voice?
• What impression do you get from each speaker based on their dress code and general appearance, their voice, and use of body language?
1 answer
1 answer