Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.

Question

Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. 

On which fact do the two sources disagree? 

(1 point)
Responses

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.

There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.

Answer 1

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness and feasibility of recycling programs in schools.

The first source emphasizes the importance of participation from school districts for recycling programs to have a significant impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, the second source expresses skepticism about the ability of schools to implement a successful recycling program due to the challenges in getting all students to comply and the potential costs involved.

Therefore, the best answer to the question is:

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.