The two sources disagree on the effectiveness and practicality of requiring school districts to recycle. Source 1 argues that requiring recycling will significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and is essential for making a positive environmental impact, emphasizing the necessity of participation from school districts. In contrast, Source 2 highlights the challenges and potential ineffectiveness of recycling programs in schools due to cost concerns and difficulties in getting all students to follow the program, suggesting that these factors could hinder the overall success of recycling initiatives.
Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.
Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective.
On which fact do the two sources disagree?
1 answer
1 answer