Sometimes, in confusing situations, we assume that other people know more than we do, so we follow their lead. That assumption might be right - but often it's not. Say you're walking by a building and see smoke coming out. Do you call 911? If other people look unconcerned, you might decide it's not an emergency. But others may decide not to phone for help because you don't look concerned. Scientists call this potential misinterpretation by a group pluralistic ignorance. It can lead to the bystander effect, where no one from a crowd steps forward to help in a situation where action is needed. It's a paradox: the more people who witness an emergency, the less chance that any of them will act, because they're all conforming to the group's behavior
According to the article, "The Effect on Others," what is the danger of the bystander effect?
which one is right
• Everyone will call for help at the same time, crashing 911.
• Someone will help, but only if they know the victim personally.
• No one will act in a situation in which action is needed.
• People who witness an emergency will become attached to the victims.
1 answer
No one will act in a situation in which action is needed.
1 answer