Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.

Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.

Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.

Answer 1

The statement that some historians believe there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households can be contrasted with the viewpoint of other historians who believe that the benefits were not similar to those enjoyed by free members of the household. This perspective emphasizes that, despite potential advantages such as the possibility of improved living conditions or social mobility, enslaved individuals did not share the same rights, freedoms, or social status as free household members.

In summary, while some historians see potential benefits for enslaved people, others highlight the limitations and unequal treatment that characterized their status compared to free individuals.