Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.

Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.

Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

Pick ther answer that is most right

Answer 1

The most appropriate answer in comparison to the idea that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households is:

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

This response highlights the crucial distinction between the experiences of enslaved individuals and those of free members of society, which aligns with the understanding that while there may have been some benefits to being part of a household, they were fundamentally different from those enjoyed by free individuals.