The theory that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households can be compared with the belief among other historians that the benefits experienced by enslaved people were not similar to those of free members of a household. This perspective suggests that, while there might have been some advantages to being part of a household, such as improved living conditions or a degree of social integration, the overall status and rights of enslaved individuals remained significantly inferior to those of free people. This view emphasizes the limitations and challenges faced by enslaved individuals, highlighting that any perceived benefits did not equate to true freedom or equality within Mesopotamian society.
Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)
Responses
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
2 answers
Just say the answer
1 answer