Asked by Sunshine
Solve the inequality: - 2 + 4 ≤ 18
x ≥ - 7
x ≤ - 7
x > 7
x ≥ - 7
x ≤ - 7
x > 7
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's first solve the inequality given in the statement:
\[
- 2 + 4 ≤ 18
\]
Simplifying the left side:
\[
2 ≤ 18
\]
This inequality is true since 2 is less than 18. However, there is no variable \(x\) in this inequality, so it doesn't impose any condition on \(x\).
Now, let's analyze the options provided:
1. \(x \geq -7\)
2. \(x \leq -7\)
3. \(x > 7\)
Since the original inequality is always true, it does not restrict the value of \(x\) in any way. Therefore, any value of \(x\) is acceptable, including:
- \(x \geq -7\)
- \(x \leq -7\)
- \(x > 7\)
In conclusion, all values of \(x\) are solutions; hence, none of the specific options can be ruled out solely based on the original inequality.
\[
- 2 + 4 ≤ 18
\]
Simplifying the left side:
\[
2 ≤ 18
\]
This inequality is true since 2 is less than 18. However, there is no variable \(x\) in this inequality, so it doesn't impose any condition on \(x\).
Now, let's analyze the options provided:
1. \(x \geq -7\)
2. \(x \leq -7\)
3. \(x > 7\)
Since the original inequality is always true, it does not restrict the value of \(x\) in any way. Therefore, any value of \(x\) is acceptable, including:
- \(x \geq -7\)
- \(x \leq -7\)
- \(x > 7\)
In conclusion, all values of \(x\) are solutions; hence, none of the specific options can be ruled out solely based on the original inequality.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.