Asked by .
Show that E is measurable if and only if kE is measurable.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
Bot
We need to show two things:
1. If E is measurable, then kE is measurable.
2. If kE is measurable, then E is measurable.
Proof of 1:
Assume E is measurable. We want to show that kE is measurable. Let A be an arbitrary subset of the real line. We have to show that kE intersects A in a measurable set if and only if E intersects k^{-1}(A) in a measurable set.
Let's first assume that kE intersects A in a measurable set. Then there exists a Borel set B such that kE ∩ A = B. Since E and k^{-1}(A) are related by the equation E = (1/k)kE and k^{-1}(A) = k^{-1}(1/k)kE, we have:
E ∩ k^{-1}(A) = (1/k)kE ∩ k^{-1}(1/k)kE = (1/k)kE ∩ E = (1/k)B
Since B is Borel, (1/k)B is also Borel, which means E intersects k^{-1}(A) in a measurable set. Therefore, kE is measurable.
Proof of 2:
Assume kE is measurable. We want to show that E is measurable. Let A be an arbitrary subset of the real line. We have to show that E intersects A in a measurable set if and only if kE intersects k(A) in a measurable set.
Let's first assume that E intersects A in a measurable set. Then there exists a Borel set B such that E ∩ A = B. Since kE and k(A) are related by the equation kE = k(k^{-1}(A) ∩ E), we have:
kE ∩ k(A) = k(k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ k(A) = k((k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ k^{-1}(k(A))) = k((k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ A)
Since B is Borel, (k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ A is also Borel, which means kE intersects k(A) in a measurable set. Therefore, E is measurable.
Hence, we have shown that E is measurable if and only if kE is measurable.
1. If E is measurable, then kE is measurable.
2. If kE is measurable, then E is measurable.
Proof of 1:
Assume E is measurable. We want to show that kE is measurable. Let A be an arbitrary subset of the real line. We have to show that kE intersects A in a measurable set if and only if E intersects k^{-1}(A) in a measurable set.
Let's first assume that kE intersects A in a measurable set. Then there exists a Borel set B such that kE ∩ A = B. Since E and k^{-1}(A) are related by the equation E = (1/k)kE and k^{-1}(A) = k^{-1}(1/k)kE, we have:
E ∩ k^{-1}(A) = (1/k)kE ∩ k^{-1}(1/k)kE = (1/k)kE ∩ E = (1/k)B
Since B is Borel, (1/k)B is also Borel, which means E intersects k^{-1}(A) in a measurable set. Therefore, kE is measurable.
Proof of 2:
Assume kE is measurable. We want to show that E is measurable. Let A be an arbitrary subset of the real line. We have to show that E intersects A in a measurable set if and only if kE intersects k(A) in a measurable set.
Let's first assume that E intersects A in a measurable set. Then there exists a Borel set B such that E ∩ A = B. Since kE and k(A) are related by the equation kE = k(k^{-1}(A) ∩ E), we have:
kE ∩ k(A) = k(k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ k(A) = k((k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ k^{-1}(k(A))) = k((k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ A)
Since B is Borel, (k^{-1}(A) ∩ E) ∩ A is also Borel, which means kE intersects k(A) in a measurable set. Therefore, E is measurable.
Hence, we have shown that E is measurable if and only if kE is measurable.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.