To evaluate reasoning, consider the strength, relevance, and sufficiency of the reasoning supporting the claim. In this case, the claim is that in many cases, a 12-year-old is mature enough to babysit a toddler.
Let's analyze each reason provided:
-
Babysitting can provide the extra money most 12-year-olds need to supplement their allowance.
- Evaluation: This reason highlights a financial benefit but does not directly address the maturity or capability of the 12-year-old to babysit. Hence, it is not a strong support for the claim.
-
A 12-year-old who has completed a babysitting course knows what is needed to responsibly tend a child.
- Evaluation: This reason directly relates to the skills and knowledge required for effective babysitting. It supports the notion that a 12-year-old can be prepared and responsible, making it a strong argument for the claim.
-
Many 12-year-olds with younger siblings have experience playing with a little sister or brother.
- Evaluation: This reason suggests practical experience, which is relevant to babysitting. However, while it indicates familiarity, it does not necessarily equate to maturity or ability to handle a babysitting situation responsibly.
-
If adolescents cannot tend a toddler by the age of 12, they probably aren’t suited for the job.
- Evaluation: This statement is somewhat circular and does not provide concrete evidence or reasoning to support why a 12-year-old could actually be mature enough to babysit.
Conclusion: The reason that most strongly supports the claim is: "A 12-year-old who has completed a babysitting course knows what is needed to responsibly tend a child." This directly speaks to the preparedness and maturity required for babysitting, making it the most effective supporting argument for the claim.
7 answers