Rather Esoteric essay, actually. What should or should not be is seldom considered by arguments in our political country, it comes down to be an exercise of poltical power.
My thinking on the above, is how would the limits of judicial review be monitored, and by whom? the President? Congress? States? and who would enforce it.
Should the Supreme Court's power of judicial review be strictly limited by a constitutional amendment?
In answering either question, clearly state your position (thesis) at the beginning of your post. Define important terms and explain your position fully. Consider pro and con arguments on both sides of your position and respond to the con arguments. Justify your position with facts and persuasive reasoning.
1 answer