It seems there might be a misunderstanding regarding the correct answer about what is NOT likely to help Sheldon with developing the setting in his stories. The original responses suggested asking where characters would go, plotting locations, and making lists of potential locations as effective methods for developing setting. On the other hand, researching clothing choices, while it can enrich the story and enhance character details, does not directly relate to the physical setting itself.
Explanation:
- Asking where characters will go: This directly relates to setting because the locations characters visit are integral to the story's environment.
- Plotting out the location of each scene: This is fundamental in creating a vivid setting and knowing where events take place.
- Making a list of potential locations: This helps to brainstorm various places that can serve as settings in the narrative.
Researching clothing choices focuses more on character detail rather than the setting itself. While clothing can add flavor to the setting (indicating the time period or cultural context), it does not define the physical environment or atmosphere where the story unfolds.
Example of the Correct Answer:
Research clothing choices: While knowing how characters dress can add depth and realism, it does not inherently contribute to developing the actual locations or settings where the story takes place. For instance, in a story set in a medieval village, knowing characters wear tunics and leggings is relevant for characterization but does not help define the village itself, such as its roads, buildings, or landscapes.
In summary, while researching clothing might enhance characterization, it does not effectively contribute to the setting, making it less likely to help Sheldon in that specific aspect of writing.
1 answer