Sheila decides to use the gift card to buy matching sets of 3 items instead. What is the greatest number of matching outfits she can buy with the gift card? Consider how to respond to the following questions.

Create and solve an inequality to determine the number of matching 3-piece outfits that Sheila can buy with the gift card.
How much money is left on the gift card after this purchase?
Could there be another combination of items that could have left less money on the gift card? How can Sheila tell?
What organized process can Sheila use to manage the different combinations of items in an efficient manner?

7 answers

To determine how many matching outfits Sheila can buy with her gift card, we first need to set up an inequality based on the total amount on the gift card and the cost of one matching set.

1. Create and Solve an Inequality

Let's denote:

  • \( G \) = total amount on the gift card
  • \( C \) = cost of one matching 3-piece outfit

Sheila wants to buy \( x \) matching outfits. The total cost of \( x \) matching outfits would be \( 3Cx \) (since each outfit consists of 3 items). The inequality will look like this:

\[ 3Cx \leq G \]

To find the maximum number of outfits, we can solve for \( x \):

\[ x \leq \frac{G}{3C} \]

Example Calculation

Assuming the value of the gift card \( G \) is $100, and the cost of each item \( C \) is $10, the inequality will be:

\[ 3(10)x \leq 100 \]

This simplifies to:

\[ 30x \leq 100 \]

Dividing both sides by 30 gives:

\[ x \leq \frac{100}{30} \approx 3.33 \]

Since \( x \) must be a whole number (you cannot buy a fraction of an outfit), the greatest number of outfits she can buy is:

\[ x = 3 \]

2. How Much Money Is Left on the Gift Card After This Purchase?

If Sheila buys 3 matching outfits, the total cost would be:

\[ \text{Total Cost} = 3 \times 3C = 9C \]

Using our previous example where \( C = 10 \):

\[ 9C = 9 \times 10 = 90 \]

Finally, the amount left on the gift card would be:

\[ \text{Money Left} = G - \text{Total Cost} = 100 - 90 = 10 \]

3. Could There Be Another Combination of Items That Could Have Left Less Money on the Gift Card?

To determine if a different combination could leave less money, Sheila can try adjusting the cost per item if possible and see if she can still maximize the number of outfits purchased. However, adding more expensive items would reduce the number of outfits she can buy due to the fixed budget, which would typically lead to more money remaining on the gift card.

The best approach is for her to consider the price of each item and remain within the constraints of the inequality previously established.

4. What Organized Process Can Sheila Use to Manage the Different Combinations of Items in an Efficient Manner?

Sheila can take several steps to manage her purchases:

  1. Update Costs and Budget: Maintain a list of the prices of items she is considering for matching outfits.

  2. Create a Table: Create a simple table or spreadsheet to evaluate different combinations of items and their cumulative costs. For instance:

    | Outfit Option | Cost per Item | Total Cost | Outfits Possible | Money Left | |---------------|----------------|------------|------------------|------------| | Option 1 | $10 | $30 | 3 | $10 | | Option 2 | $15 | $45 | 2 | $10 | | Option 3 | $8 | $24 | 4 | $4 |

  3. Evaluate Options: Regularly analyze these combinations to find the maximum number of outfits while monitoring how much money might remain.

  4. Calculate Remaining Budget: After establishing which combinations fit the inequality, she should always calculate how much remains after each option to ensure the most efficient use of her budget.

By using this organized process, Sheila can effectively gauge her purchases and make informed decisions based on her preferences and budget constraints.

make it explained in words and make the answer within 250 words

To determine how many matching outfits Sheila can buy with her gift card, we start by establishing an inequality. Let’s say the total amount on the gift card is \( G \) and the cost of one outfit (comprising 3 items) is \( C \). The inequality to represent her budget for buying \( x \) outfits would be:

\[ 3Cx \leq G \]

To find the maximum number of outfits, we solve for \( x \):

\[ x \leq \frac{G}{3C} \]

For example, if her gift card is worth $100 and each item costs $10, we can calculate:

\[ 3(10)x \leq 100 \implies 30x \leq 100 \implies x \leq 3 \]

Thus, Sheila can buy a maximum of 3 matching outfits. The total cost for 3 outfits would be:

\[ 3 \times 30 = 90 \]

This leaves her with:

\[ 100 - 90 = 10 \]

Regarding combinations with different costs, if items are more expensive, she could purchase fewer outfits, typically leaving more money on the card.

To efficiently manage her options, Sheila can create a table listing different combinations of outfits, their costs, and how many outfits she can afford. This organized approach allows her to analyze the best options as she weighs the cost against the remaining budget, ensuring she maximizes her purchase while staying within her gift card limits.

make it shorter

To find out how many matching outfits Sheila can buy with her gift card, we set up an inequality. Let’s assume the gift card amount is \( G \) and the cost of one item is \( C \). The inequality for \( x \) outfits would be:

\[ 3Cx \leq G \]

For example, if her gift card is worth $100 and each item costs $10, we have:

\[ 3(10)x \leq 100 \implies 30x \leq 100 \implies x \leq 3 \]

Thus, Sheila can buy a maximum of 3 outfits. The total cost for 3 outfits is:

\[ 3 \times 30 = 90 \]

She would then have:

\[ 100 - 90 = 10 \]

As for whether other combinations could leave her with less money, more expensive items would mean fewer outfits and typically more money left over.

To manage her options effectively, Sheila can create a table listing different combinations of outfits and their costs. This organized method allows her to ensure she maximizes her purchases within her gift card limit while keeping track of the remaining balance.

make it even shorter

To determine how many matching outfits Sheila can buy with her gift card, we use the inequality \( 3Cx \leq G \), where \( G \) is the gift card amount and \( C \) is the cost of one item.

For example, with a $100 gift card and $10 per item, we calculate:

\[ 3(10)x \leq 100 \implies 30x \leq 100 \implies x \leq 3 \]

She can buy a maximum of 3 outfits, costing $90, leaving her with $10.

If she chooses more expensive items, she may end up with more money remaining but fewer outfits.

To manage her options efficiently, Sheila can create a table listing different outfit combinations and their costs. This helps her maximize purchases while staying within her budget.