Shauna has collected a variety of sources for her research about Charlie Chaplin’s impact on American cinema. In performing her preliminary evaluation of each source, Shauna should

thoroughly review and examine the content.
perform a quick search to determine the author’s reliability.
check whether the author agrees with experts on the subject.
decide whether it will be useful in her final essay.

7 answers

In evaluating her sources for research about Charlie Chaplin’s impact on American cinema, Shauna should focus on several key aspects. Among the options provided, "decide whether it will be useful in her final essay" stands out as particularly crucial. While all options have merit, here's a breakdown:

  1. Thoroughly review and examine the content: This is important, but it may come after considering whether the source aligns with her research objectives.

  2. Perform a quick search to determine the author’s reliability: Understanding the credentials of authors is vital to gauge the trustworthiness of the information.

  3. Check whether the author agrees with experts on the subject: This could help in evaluating the credibility of the arguments made in the source.

  4. Decide whether it will be useful in her final essay: Ultimately, this is essential because the sources must contribute meaningfully to her thesis and support her arguments.

In summary, while all evaluations are critical, determining the usefulness of the source will guide her decision-making process effectively. Thus, prioritizing this evaluation after checking the reliability of the sources and their contents could be the most beneficial approach for her research.

Anthony is writing a research paper about healthy eating, and this is one entry on his works cited page.

Adams, Ruth. “Eat Apples.” The Journal of Nutrition 222 (2011): 26-31. Print.

What does “26-31” represent?
the pages of the source that Anthony used
the issue number of the source
the date the source was published
the pages of Anthony’s paper where the source was used

In the citation provided:

Adams, Ruth. “Eat Apples.” The Journal of Nutrition 222 (2011): 26-31. Print.

The notation "26-31" represents the pages of the source that Anthony used. It indicates that the article by Ruth Adams spans pages 26 to 31 in that particular issue of The Journal of Nutrition.

Julia is writing a research paper about vegetarianism, and she has several potential research questions. Which is her best option?
How many people in the US practice vegetarianism?
Do most vegetarians eat dairy and eggs?
What is the effect of vegetarianism on the human body?
Can vegetarians wear leather shoes and jackets?

Among the research questions listed, the best option for Julia’s research paper about vegetarianism is:

What is the effect of vegetarianism on the human body?

This question is broad enough to allow for in-depth exploration and analysis, including various aspects such as health benefits, potential nutrient deficiencies, and overall impacts on well-being. The other questions, while relevant, tend to be more factual or limited in scope, while Julia's selected question opens the door to a comprehensive examination of vegetarianism's implications, which aligns well with the objectives of an academic research paper.

Juan is writing a paper about children who play team sports, and he has several potential research questions. Which is his best option?
Do most children enjoy team sports or individual sports?
What team sports are most popular among children?
Why don’t all children participate in team sports?
How does playing a team sport affect a child’s development?

The best option for Juan's research paper about children who play team sports is:

How does playing a team sport affect a child’s development?

This question is the most comprehensive and allows for an in-depth exploration of the topic. It opens avenues to discuss various developmental aspects, including physical, social, emotional, and psychological benefits or challenges associated with participating in team sports. The other questions, while relevant, are more factual or narrow in focus, which may not provide as rich or expansive a discussion as the selected question.