Shantel offers online tutorial services. She charges $25.00 an hour per student. Her budget tracker reflects a total of $3,200.00 monthly expenses.

How many hours must Shantel work each month to earn a monthly profit of at least $600.00? (1 point)
at least
hours

11 answers

To determine how many hours Shantel must work each month to earn a monthly profit of at least $600, we can follow these steps:

  1. Define Total Income: Shantel charges $25.00 per hour per student. Let \( H \) be the number of hours she works. Therefore, her total income from one student is:

\[ \text{Total Income} = 25 \times H \]

  1. Define Total Expenses: Her monthly expenses are given as $3,200.00.

  2. Define Profit: Profit is defined as total income minus total expenses. Thus, the profit can be expressed as:

\[ \text{Profit} = \text{Total Income} - \text{Total Expenses} \]

Substituting the known values:

\[ \text{Profit} = (25 \times H) - 3200 \]

  1. Set Profit Condition: She wants the profit to be at least $600. Thus, we set up the inequality:

\[ (25 \times H) - 3200 \geq 600 \]

  1. Solve for \( H \):
    • Adding $3,200 to both sides:

\[ 25 \times H \geq 600 + 3200 \]

\[ 25 \times H \geq 3800 \]

  • Dividing both sides by 25:

\[ H \geq \frac{3800}{25} \]

\[ H \geq 152 \]

Therefore, Shantel must work at least 152 hours each month to earn a monthly profit of at least $600.00.

La'Shondra solves the inequality 6 + 3x ≤ 24. She begins by subtracting 6 from both sides of the inequality and then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by a number. What is the number? (1 point)

Let's solve the inequality step by step to determine what number La'Shondra divides by:

  1. Start with the original inequality: \[ 6 + 3x \leq 24 \]

  2. Subtract 6 from both sides: \[ 3x \leq 24 - 6 \] \[ 3x \leq 18 \]

  3. Next, she will divide both sides of the inequality by a number. To isolate \( x \), we divide both sides by 3: \[ x \leq \frac{18}{3} \] \[ x \leq 6 \]

Therefore, the number that La'Shondra divides both sides of the inequality by is 3.

Jorelle is planning a 5-day vacation. The trip will cost him $1,300.00 for airfare, food, and itineraries. He plans to stay in a hotel room for $80.00 per night. He only has $950.00 in savings, but he earns $25.00 per hour from his online tutoring services. Create a linear inequality in one variable that would best translate the problem. Determine the minimum number of hours Jorelle must tutor so he can have enough money for the trip. (1 point)
• 950 + 25x ≤ 1, 700; at most 30 hours
• 950 + 25x ≥ 1, 700; at least 30 hours
• 950 + 25x ≤ 1, 300; at most 14 hours
• 950 + 25x ≥ 1, 300; at least 14 hours

Let's break down Jorelle's situation and translate it into a linear inequality:

  1. Total cost of the trip:

    • Jorelle's trip costs $1,300. This includes airfare, food, and itineraries.
    • He will also stay in a hotel room for $80.00 per night for 5 nights.
    • Total hotel cost will be: \[ 80 \times 5 = 400 \]

    Adding this to the initial trip cost: \[ 1,300 + 400 = 1,700 \] So, the total cost of the trip is actually $1,700.

  2. Savings and Earnings:

    • Jorelle has $950 in savings.
    • He earns $25 per hour from tutoring.
    • Let \( x \) be the number of hours he tutors. Therefore, his total money from tutoring would be \( 25x \).
  3. Total funds available: He needs enough money to cover the total trip cost. His total money available can be expressed as: \[ 950 + 25x \]

  4. Inequality: To ensure he has enough money for the trip, we set up the inequality: \[ 950 + 25x \geq 1,700 \]

Now, let's analyze the options provided:

  • 950 + 25x ≤ 1,700; at most 30 hours
  • 950 + 25x ≥ 1,700; at least 30 hours
  • 950 + 25x ≤ 1,300; at most 14 hours
  • 950 + 25x ≥ 1,300; at least 14 hours

The correct inequality is:

  • 950 + 25x ≥ 1,700;

Now, let's solve the inequality to find the minimum number of hours Jorelle must tutor:

  1. Solve the inequality: \[ 950 + 25x \geq 1,700 \] Subtract 950 from both sides: \[ 25x \geq 1,700 - 950 \] \[ 25x \geq 750 \] Divide by 25: \[ x \geq \frac{750}{25} \] \[ x \geq 30 \]

Thus, Jorelle must tutor at least 30 hours to have enough money for the trip.

Therefore, the correct translation of the problem and minimum hours requirement is:

950 + 25x ≥ 1,700; at least 30 hours.

Mary Ann solves the inequality - 3x ≥ 12. Justify the steps Mary Ann takes to find the solution set. (1 point)
Mary Ann adds -3 to both sides of the inequality and changes the inequality symbol to ≤ to get x ≤ 9.
• Mary Ann divides both sides of the inequality by - 3 to get x > -4.
Mary Ann divides both sides of the inequality by - 3 and changes the inequality symbol to ≤ to get x ≤ —4.
• Mary Ann adds - 3 to both sides of the inequality to get x ≥ 9.

Let's examine the original inequality that Mary Ann is solving:

\[ -3x \geq 12 \]

To solve for \( x \), Mary Ann needs to isolate \( x \). Here’s how she should correctly proceed, along with justifications for each step:

  1. Dividing by -3: Mary Ann needs to divide both sides of the inequality by -3. However, an important rule when dealing with inequalities is that when you divide or multiply both sides by a negative number, you must reverse the inequality sign.

    So, performing this operation: \[ -3x \geq 12 \quad \text{(Dividing both sides by -3)} \]

    Thus, changing the inequality sign: \[ x \leq \frac{12}{-3} \] This simplifies to: \[ x \leq -4 \]

Based on this explanation, the correct justification for Mary Ann’s steps is:

  • Mary Ann divides both sides of the inequality by -3 and changes the inequality symbol to ≤ to get \( x \leq -4 \).

This option correctly reflects the necessary steps and the appropriate treatment of the inequality sign.

Kirk solves the inequality 5 < 12y - 7. Which statement explains the steps he uses to find the solution set of the inequality? (1 point)
Kirk adds 7 to both sides of the inequality and then multiplies both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 to get 144 < y.
Kirk adds -7 to both sides of the inequality and then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 to get (- 6) < y.
Kirk adds 7 to both sides of the inequality, then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 and reverses the inequality symbol to get 1 > y.

Kirk adds 7 to both sides of the inequality and then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 to get 1 < y.

Let's solve the inequality step by step and find the correct explanation for Kirk's method:

The original inequality is:

\[ 5 < 12y - 7 \]

Now, let's go through the steps to solve the inequality:

  1. Add 7 to both sides: \[ 5 + 7 < 12y \] This simplifies to: \[ 12 < 12y \]

  2. Divide both sides by 12: \[ \frac{12}{12} < y \] This simplifies to: \[ 1 < y \] or equivalently: \[ y > 1 \]

Now, looking at the given statements:

  1. Kirk adds 7 to both sides of the inequality and then multiplies both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 to get 144 < y.

    • This is incorrect. He does not multiply both sides by 12, and the result is not correct.
  2. Kirk adds -7 to both sides of the inequality and then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 to get (-6) < y.

    • This is incorrect as well because he should add 7, not subtract.
  3. Kirk adds 7 to both sides of the inequality, then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 and reverses the inequality symbol to get 1 > y.

    • This is incorrect because he does not need to reverse the inequality.
  4. Kirk adds 7 to both sides of the inequality and then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 to get 1 < y.

    • This statement is correct. He correctly adds 7 and divides by 12, leading to the proper result of \( 1 < y \) (or \( y > 1 \)).

Thus, the correct statement explaining Kirk's steps is:

Kirk adds 7 to both sides of the inequality and then divides both sides of the equivalent inequality by 12 to get \( 1 < y \).

Which of the following shows how to solve the linear inequality with a letter
coefficient Hy < 7, where H is a number greater than 0? (1 point)
Oy <7H

Oy<]
H

Oy<7

• Hy < 7

To solve the linear inequality \( Hy < 7 \) where \( H \) is a number greater than 0, we need to isolate \( y \). Here are the steps:

  1. Divide both sides of the inequality by \( H \):

    Since \( H \) is greater than 0, the direction of the inequality does not change. Therefore, we divide both sides by \( H \):

    \[ y < \frac{7}{H} \]

Now, let’s evaluate the options provided based on the correct procedure:

  1. Oy < 7H:

    • This option is incorrect.
  2. Oy < ]H:

    • This option appears to be incorrectly formatted; it's not valid.
  3. Oy < 7:

    • This option is incorrect since we know \( H \) is supposed to be dividing the 7; it's not consistent with our derived result.
  4. Hy < 7:

    • This option is simply the original inequality and does not show how to solve it.

None of the options provided clearly show \( y < \frac{7}{H} \). If we must choose one, there’s no acceptable answer from the options given since the correct answer based on the steps should be:

\[ y < \frac{7}{H} \]

If you meant to evaluate how we solve \( Hy < 7 \), the steps lead us to \( y < \frac{7}{H} \).

Please clarify if there were any mistakes in presenting the options or if further assistance is needed!