To identify two ways that the author, Peter Walker, uses rhetoric to advance his point of view in paragraph 6 of “The Bike Helmet Debate,” here are the most relevant options based on the provided responses:
-
He includes the phrase “physical activity” to convince the reader that there is always some risk with physical activity.
This rhetorical choice emphasizes that risk is inherent in activities, thereby framing the debate around bike helmets in a broader context of risk associated with physical activities. -
He uses an analogy to compare the risk of injury for cycling in dangerous environments versus safe environments.
By using an analogy, the author can make complex comparisons more relatable and highlight the nuances in the argument about helmet use, thus enhancing his point of view.
These two rhetorical strategies effectively contribute to the advancement of the author's argument in the paragraph.