- The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society.
- The Court ruled that controlling printed and spoken words is a violation of freedom of speech and unconstitutional according to the First Amendment.
Select ALL the correct answers.
Which two reasons explain why the ruling in the Schenck v United States Supreme Court case is significant regarding the First Amendment?
The Court ruled that the regulation of freedom of speech is justifiable if what is spoken or written presented a clear and present danger to society.
The Court upheld the verdict of several politicians under the Espionage Act for making speeches opposing the war.
The Court ruled the Sedition Act was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Rights to freedom of speech.
The Court ruled that controlling printed and spoken words is a violation of freedom of speech and unconstitutional according to the First Amendment.
The Court upheld the conviction of several individuals for circulating materials supporting their political views.
1 answer
13 answers