To determine how much Jackson will have saved after 6 weeks, we need to know his weekly earnings. Since that information is not provided, we can't calculate the exact amount saved.
However, we can express the savings mathematically:
Let \( x \) be Jackson's weekly earnings.
He saves 65% of his earnings, which means each week he saves:
\[ 0.65x \]
Over 6 weeks, the total amount saved would be:
\[ 6 \times 0.65x = 3.9x \]
Now we can check the options given to see if any of them can fit this expression under the condition of different values for \( x \).
-
If he saves $600 in total: \[ 3.9x = 600 \Longrightarrow x \approx 153.85 \] (this scenario can work)
-
If he saves $640 in total: \[ 3.9x = 640 \Longrightarrow x \approx 164.10 \] (this scenario can work)
-
If he saves $585 in total: \[ 3.9x = 585 \Longrightarrow x \approx 150 \] (this scenario can work)
-
If he saves $540 in total: \[ 3.9x = 540 \Longrightarrow x \approx 138.46 \] (this scenario can work)
Since all values can technically work for different weekly earnings, we cannot determine a specific answer without knowing Jackson's weekly earnings. Thus, if the problem assumes a specific earning that leads to one of those values, it would be crucial to have that information.
If this question was designed for a specific answer, it could be possible that Jackson has a target figure that we assess instead. Assuming that he had $600 in total after 6 weeks, we'd conclude that he made approximately $153.85 weekly. Thus, without knowing Jackson's exact weekly earnings, an answer can't be definitively chosen.