Scientists believe there is a link between ambient temperature and damage to a head gasket on a car. Using the provided information, draw a scatter plot of the data. Based on the data, make a probabilistic inference about if you should take your truck on a road trip to an area that has very low temperatures predicted for the time you will be there.

Question

(1 point)
Responses

I would recommend that he does NOT go as lower temperatures have a strong negative correlation, therefore the lower the temperature the more damage is caused.
I would recommend that he does NOT go as lower temperatures have a strong negative correlation, therefore the lower the temperature the more damage is caused.

I would recommend that he does NOT go as higher temperatures have a strong positive correlation, therefore the higher the temperature the more damage is caused.
I would recommend that he does NOT go as higher temperatures have a strong positive correlation, therefore the higher the temperature the more damage is caused.

I would recommend that he goes as lower temperatures have a strong positive correlation, therefore the lower the temperature the less damage is caused.
I would recommend that he goes as lower temperatures have a strong positive correlation, therefore the lower the temperature the less damage is caused.

I would recommend that he goes, as there were many more temperatures with no damage than with damage.
I would recommend that he goes, as there were many more temperatures with no damage than with damage.
Skip to navigation

Answer 1

To make a probabilistic inference about taking your truck on a road trip to an area with predicted low temperatures, we would need specific data on the relationship between ambient temperature and damage to a head gasket. However, since we don't have the actual data or scatter plot provided here, let's deduce the likely correct response based on common statistical reasoning about temperature and mechanical damage.

Given that:

• If lower temperatures are correlated with increased head gasket damage, it would indicate a negative correlation (i.e., as temperature goes down, damage goes up).
• Conversely, if higher temperatures are correlated with increased damage, this would indicate a positive correlation (i.e., as temperature goes up, damage goes up).

Considering the options provided and typical scientific findings, here’s a clear reasoning path for each option:

1. If lower temperatures lead to more damage: This aligns with the statement "lower temperatures have a strong negative correlation." Hence, this would be a valid inference if the data shows that as temperatures drop, the likelihood of head gasket damage increases.

2. If higher temperatures lead to more damage: That would imply that one should avoid areas with high temperatures, but this doesn't apply to the question regarding low temperatures.

3. If lower temperatures have less damage: This suggests a positive correlation, which contradicts typical expectations for head gasket damage as shown in the provided statements.

4. If there are more instances of no damage than damage: This would indicate that even in lower temperatures, the truck might not sustain damage often.

Given these considerations, it's most likely the first option is the correct inference:

"I would recommend that he does NOT go as lower temperatures have a strong negative correlation; therefore, the lower the temperature, the more damage is caused."

Thus, if the assessment of the data indicates a negative correlation between temperature and head gasket damage, it would suggest caution in taking the truck to an area with low temperatures.