Scientist Jordan makes a discovery and publishes the results for other scientists to read. Scientist Leesha tries to repeat the experiment and cannot make it work. Her results are also published. Scientist Jordan looks at his data again and finds that the discovery only works under certain conditions. He publishes the change. Now scientist Leesha repeats the new method and finds the same results as Jordan, but another scientist, Winslow, gets different results.

What does this story demonstrate?
A.
that scientific knowledge is impossible to obtain
B.
that scientific knowledge is developed by individual scientists in isolation
C.
that scientists are really good at arguing
D.
that scientific knowledge results from a lot of debate and confirmation

1 answer

The story demonstrates:

D. that scientific knowledge results from a lot of debate and confirmation.

This narrative illustrates the iterative nature of scientific inquiry, where reproducibility, scrutiny, and discussion among scientists lead to a deeper understanding and refinement of knowledge.