Schrodinger and Heisenberg developed an alternate theory about atomic nature that contradicted some of Bohr's model of the atom. How do changes resulting from new technology and evidence affect the reputation of the atomic theory?

Each time a theory is changed because of new evidence, it becomes less popular with the scientific community.
Each time a theory is changed because of new evidence, it becomes weaker and damages the reputations of the scientists involved.
Each time a theory is tested with new evidence, it convinces more people to accept it as truth.
Each time a theory is tested with new evidence, it becomes stronger and more durable.

1 answer

The most accurate statement regarding how changes resulting from new technology and evidence affect the reputation of atomic theory is:

Each time a theory is tested with new evidence, it becomes stronger and more durable.

This is because the scientific process is inherently iterative; theories are continuously refined and improved based on new findings and experimental results. When new evidence supports or builds upon a theory, it helps to solidify its acceptance within the scientific community. Essentially, a theory that can withstand rigorous testing and incorporate new data is often viewed as more robust and reliable.