Question
Use the sources and scenario description to answer the question.
After analyzing the writer’s list of sources, which statement best explains why one source should probably be removed?
(1 point)
Responses
Source 2 is not reputable because it is a blog where the author can publish whatever they want.
Source 2 is not reputable because it is a blog where the author can publish whatever they want.
Source 1 is too old because it was published over fifty years ago.
Source 1 is too old because it was published over fifty years ago.
Source 1 is not credible because it has an anonymous author.
Source 1 is not credible because it has an anonymous author.
Source 2 is not credible because there is no proof that Robert Teller is a criminology expert.
1 answer
The best statement explaining why one source should probably be removed is:
Source 2 is not reputable because it is a blog where the author can publish whatever they want.
This statement addresses the reliability of the source based on the medium, which often lacks the rigorous editorial standards found in more reputable publications, making it a less trustworthy reference in an academic context.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
2 answers