scale:%201%20box%20=%205%20feet%0A%0AReproduce%20the%20scale%20drawing%20of%20Tomas%E2%80%99s%20front%20yard%20so%20that%20it%20has%20a%20scale%20of%201%20box%20=%2010%20feet.%20Which%20shows%20the%20new%20scale%20drawing?%0A%0A(1%20point)

Dimensions for 1: 16 and 12
Dimensions for 2: 6 and 3
Dimensions for 3. 3 and 2
Dimensions for 4: 4 and 3

You can only pick one

5 answers

To scale the drawing from a scale of 1 box = 5 feet to a new scale of 1 box = 10 feet, you need to convert the original dimensions accordingly.

Given the information:

  • Original scale: 1 box = 5 feet
  • New scale: 1 box = 10 feet

Since the new scale is double the original scale, you will halve the original dimensions to find the new dimensions.

  1. For dimensions 16 and 12 (original dimensions):

    • New dimensions = (16 / 2) and (12 / 2) = 8 and 6 (not listed)
  2. For dimensions 6 and 3:

    • New dimensions = (6 / 2) and (3 / 2) = 3 and 1.5 (not listed)
  3. For dimensions 3 and 2:

    • New dimensions = (3 / 2) and (2 / 2) = 1.5 and 1 (not listed)
  4. For dimensions 4 and 3:

    • New dimensions = (4 / 2) and (3 / 2) = 2 and 1.5 (not listed)

Since none of the provided options (16 and 12, 6 and 3, 3 and 2, or 4 and 3) correspond to any of the new dimensions derived from halving, you might want to check the values again or provide further context.

If you only need to choose one from the options given without consideration of the new scale conversion, you would choose Dimensions for 2: 6 and 3 as a valid option. However, none of the options reflect the appropriate conversion based on the scale reference provided.

scale:%201%20box%20=%204%20centimeters%0A%0AReproduce%20the%20scale%20drawing%20so%20that%20it%20has%20a%20scale%20of%201%20box%20=%202%20centimeters.%20Which%20shows%20the%20correct%20new%20scale%20drawing?%0A%0A(1%20point)%0AResponses%0A

Dimensions for 1: 12 and 4
Dimensions for 2: 3 and 1
Dimensions for 3: 6 and 3
Dimensions for 4. 12 and 2

You can only pick one

To convert the scale of the drawing from 1 box = 4 centimeters to 1 box = 2 centimeters, you need to adjust the original dimensions based on the scaling factor.

Here's how to do it:

  1. Original scale: 1 box = 4 centimeters
  2. New scale: 1 box = 2 centimeters

Since the new scale is half of the original scale, we need to double the dimensions to find the new dimensions.

Calculate the New Dimensions:

  1. For Dimensions for 1: 12 and 4:

    • New dimensions = (12 * 2) and (4 * 2) = 24 and 8
  2. For Dimensions for 2: 3 and 1:

    • New dimensions = (3 * 2) and (1 * 2) = 6 and 2
  3. For Dimensions for 3: 6 and 3:

    • New dimensions = (6 * 2) and (3 * 2) = 12 and 6
  4. For Dimensions for 4: 12 and 2:

    • New dimensions = (12 * 2) and (2 * 2) = 24 and 4

Conclusion:

Out of the calculated new dimensions based on the response options, the correct matches are:

  • Dimensions for 2: 3 and 1 corresponds to 6 and 2, which is valid for the new scale of 1 box = 2 centimeters.

Therefore, you should choose:

Dimensions for 2: 3 and 1.

No bot your incorrect

The answers are:
12,4
4,3

I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. Let's clarify and confirm the calculations, especially focusing on the two mentioned options.

Original Scale Conversion:

  • Original Scale: 1 box = 4 centimeters
  • New Scale: 1 box = 2 centimeters

To find the new dimensions when changing from a scale of 4 cm to 2 cm, we need to double the original dimensions because the new scale decreases the physical representation for the same units.

Checking the Given Dimensions:

  1. Dimensions for 1: 12 and 4

    • New dimensions = (12 * 2) and (4 * 2) = 24 and 8 (not suitable)
  2. Dimensions for 2: 3 and 1

    • New dimensions = (3 * 2) and (1 * 2) = 6 and 2 (not suitable)
  3. Dimensions for 3: 6 and 3

    • New dimensions = (6 * 2) and (3 * 2) = 12 and 6 (not suitable)
  4. Dimensions for 4: 12 and 2

    • New dimensions = (12 * 2) and (2 * 2) = 24 and 4 (not suitable)

Clarifying the Correct Options for the New Scale:

Now, let's check your updated options:

  • 12 and 4 becomes 24 and 8 (invalid).
  • 4 and 3 becomes 8 and 6 (invalid).

If you were to say 12 and 4 are indeed suitable, then there might be some confusion in knowing that each of these options should be validated against the knowledge of scaling. The doubled dimensions don't fit them correctly.

Therefore, based on the new understanding:

  • If you meant that the original drawing should maintain dimensions but inherently scale down, I could clarify the representations and context better.

Nevertheless, if you reaffirm that:

  1. 12 and 4 and 4 and 3 are correct, then I appreciate the patience and would want to better contextualize those results in how you derived them accordingly.

If you need further insights or relations with explicit dimensions, I’m here to assist!