Sandra was simplifying 45–√⋅23–√

, and she ended up with 815−−√
as her simplified answer.

Is Sandra correct? If she is not correct, what was her mistake?

(1 point)
Responses

Sandra's answer is not correct. She could continue to simplify the radical to get 245–√
.
Sandra's answer is not correct. She could continue to simplify the radical to get 24 square root of 5.

Sandra's simplified answer is correct.
Sandra's simplified answer is correct.

Sandra's answer is not correct. She should have added the coefficients to get 615−−√
Sandra's answer is not correct. She should have added the coefficients to get 6 square root of 15

Sandra's answer is not correct. She should have multiplied 4 times 5 in the first radical and multiplied 2 times 3 in the second radical to get a final answer of 26.

1 answer

To evaluate Sandra's simplification of \( 45 - \sqrt{23} \), let's simplify the expression correctly to see if she made an error.

We need to clarify what \( 45 - \sqrt{23} \) means. Assuming she meant \( 45 - \sqrt{23} \):

  1. Check for simplification of \( \sqrt{23} \): The square root of 23 cannot be simplified further because 23 is a prime number.
  2. Combine the radicals: If there were any radicals to combine, we would look for like terms. However, we only have one radical, \( \sqrt{23} \).

From what we see, Sandra ended up with \( \sqrt{815} \), which could mean she incorrectly combined or translated components from the original expression.

Let's look at the claims from the responses:

  • Sandra's answer is not correct. She could continue to simplify the radical to get \( \sqrt{245} \): This is incorrect; we cannot simplify \( \sqrt{23} \) to \( \sqrt{245} \).
  • Sandra's answer is not correct. She could continue to simplify the radical to get \( 24 \sqrt{5}: Incorrect; there is no ( 24 \sqrt{5} \) from \( 45 - \sqrt{23} \).
  • Sandra's simplified answer is correct.: This seems at first glance to be questionable since there is no evident simplification that leads directly to \( \sqrt{815} \) without more context.
  • Sandra's answer is not correct. She should have added the coefficients to get ( 6\sqrt{15}: Not applicable since there's no additional radical to combine.
  • Sandra's answer is not correct. She should have multiplied \( 4 \times 5 \) in the first radical and multiplied \( 2 \times 3 \) in the second radical to get a final answer of \( 26: This is incorrect as there are no such multiplicative components visible in the expression ( 45 - \sqrt{23} \).

Since none of the options seem accurate based on typical simplification processes of radicals, it's likely Sandra's answer of \( \sqrt{815} \) isn't yielding a simplifiable form derived from \( 45 - \sqrt{23} \) correctly.

Thus, the overall conclusion is: Sandra's answer is not correct. The formatting of her final answer appears flawed without clear reasoning from the provided expression \( 45 - \sqrt{23} \). More context would be needed for direct verification or consolidation of terms in her original submission.

Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. Use the script to answer the question.SANDRA: (looking out the kitchen window) Leslie, honey, I don't think we will be able to
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Use the script to answer the question.SANDRA: (looking out the kitchen window) Leslie, honey, I don't think we will be able to
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Use the script to answer the question.SANDRA: (looking out the kitchen window) Leslie, honey, I don't think we will be able to
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions