To address the scenario, we first analyze the parts:
- Ryan starts with $60.
- For the first 6 weeks, he spends $5 each week.
- After week 6, he spends $10 each week until his money is fully spent.
Let’s calculate how much money Ryan has after each period:
-
Weeks 1-6:
- Money spent in 6 weeks: \( 6 \times 5 = 30 \)
- Money remaining after 6 weeks: \( 60 - 30 = 30 \)
-
Weeks 7 and onward:
- Starting with $30, and now he spends $10 per week.
- Weeks needed to spend remaining $30: \( \frac{30}{10} = 3 \) weeks.
Total weeks spent before money is fully spent:
- 6 weeks + 3 weeks = 9 weeks.
Now, looking at the provided options about the y-intercept:
The y-intercept in this context represents the starting amount of money Ryan had, which is $60. In a graph where the x-axis represents weeks and the y-axis represents money, the intercept would be at (0, 60).
Thus, the first option that matches the y-intercept is:
- (0, 60)
The explanation for this option matches the statement that Ryan started with $60 in his account.
So the answer you are looking for is:
- (0, 60)
- Ryan started with $60 in his account.