To determine how much smaller the surface area of the small dog house is compared to the big dog house, we first need to establish the relationship between their sizes.
Let's denote:
- \(S\) as the surface area of the small dog house,
- \(B\) as the surface area of the big dog house.
If the small house is the same size as the big house, it means their surface areas are equal, which is:
\[ S = B \]
If we are interested in how much smaller the surface area of the small house is compared to the big house, since they are equal, we can express this as:
\[ S - B = 0 \]
Thus, the surface area of the small house is \(0\) times the size of the big house, which simplifies the fraction of the surface areas between them.
In terms of a fraction, we can write:
\[ \text{The surface area of the small house will be } \frac{S}{B} = \frac{B}{B} = 1 \]
This means the surface area of the small house is the same size as the big house, so there is no difference.
However, if we were to denote that the small house is proportionally smaller in size, typically in a scenario, it could be indicated as a fraction of their sizes depending on the specific dimensions.
If no additional detail is provided about their respective sizes, we typically conclude that the surface area of the small house holds equal proportions but can affirmatively state:
The surface area of the small house will be 1 times the size of the big house. If the argument indicates it is smaller than a specified dimension, it would depend on the calculations from the mentioned proportions which weren't defined in the above context.
Therefore, formally restating with proper analysis reflects:
The surface area of the small house will be \( \frac{0}{B} = 0 \) smaller than the big house, meaning ultimately it is not smaller but the same in the above context— thus:
The surface area of the small dog house will be 0 less than the big house if sizes are identical, leading to, as sought:
The surface area of the small house will be 0 the size of the big house.