In this analogy, Juliet suggests that a name, like "Romeo," does not define the essential qualities of a person, just as a rose would still smell sweet regardless of what it is called. She implies that Romeo's identity and worth are intrinsic and would remain unchanged even if he were not associated with the Montague name.
Romeo and Juliet
by William Shakespeare
Juliet.
What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other word would smell as sweet.
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo called,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title.
From Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare
Question
Use the passage to answer the question.
In one or two sentences, describe the meaning of this analogy.
(2 points)
Short Answer Rubric (2 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
2
The answer is very clear.
The answer is fully supported by details.
There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.
1
The answer is somewhat clear.
Details are weak or not related.
There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.
0 The question is not answered.
1 answer