To calculate \( 552 \div 23 \) using partial quotients, let's break down both Rihanna's and Gavin's work to see how each arrived at their results and verify the calculations.
Rihanna's Work:
-
Step 1: She subtracts \( 20 \times 23 \) from \( 552 \): \[ 552 - (20 \times 23) = 552 - 460 = 92 \] (This part is correct.)
-
Step 2: She then subtracts \( 4 \times 23 \) from \( 92 \): \[ 92 - (4 \times 23) = 92 - 92 = 0 \] (This part is also correct, and she reaches zero.)
-
Step 3: Now, we add the partial quotients: \[ 20 + 4 = 24 \] Thus, Rihanna's quotient is 24.
Gavin's Work:
-
Step 1: He subtracts \( 10 \times 23 \) from \( 552 \): \[ 552 - (10 \times 23) = 552 - 230 = 322 \] (This is correct.)
-
Step 2: He subtracts \( 10 \times 23 \) from \( 322 \): \[ 322 - (10 \times 23) = 322 - 230 = 92 \] (This is also correct.)
-
Step 3: He subtracts \( 2 \times 23 \) from \( 92 \): \[ 92 - (2 \times 23) = 92 - 46 = 46 \] (This part is correct.)
-
Step 4: Subtracts \( 2 \times 23 \) from \( 46 \): \[ 46 - (2 \times 23) = 46 - 46 = 0 \] (This part is also correct.)
-
Step 5: Now, let's sum the partial quotients: \[ 10 + 10 + 2 + 2 = 24 \] Thus, Gavin's quotient is also 24.
Conclusion:
Both Rihanna and Gavin correctly calculated the quotient of \( 552 \div 23 \) to be 24.
The work done by both is valid, as they each used subtraction to progressively find how many times \( 23 \) can be subtracted from \( 552 \) until reaching zero, hence confirming the correctness of the division. The method of partial quotients allows for flexible division, and both students executed it successfully.