Saying people’s rights need to be respected no matter what happens. Dostoyevsky's story makes us think hard about Kant’s ideas, pushing us to ask if we can justify any suffering when we should respect human life above all. We can also look at what Nietzsche thought. He questions the usual ideas of good and evil, saying morals change over time. But Dostoyevsky wants us to see that morality is really about how people relate to each other, suggesting a more traditional view compared to Nietzsche's bold rethinking of what’s right and wrong.
rewrite this sentence unprofessionally and simpler
"asserting that such rights must be upheld irrespective of the potential outcomes. Dostoyevsky's narrative forces a confrontation with Kantian ethics, compelling the reader to consider whether any rationalization for suffering can hold weight against an unconditional respect for human life. Additionally, one could examine Nietzsche’s perspectives. Nietzsche, too, challenges the established moral frameworks, though from a different angle—he questions the very foundations of goodness and evil, suggesting that moral values are historically contingent constructs. Dostoyevsky, however, implores readers to recognize the sobering essence of morality rooted in relational dynamics between individuals, underscoring a conservative grounding against Nietzsche's more radical reevaluation of ethical values."
1 answer
1 answer