Review the Hexagonal Thinking: Colonial Society & Revolution diagram in Step 1 of this question and locate the graphic pointing to "Connection #1". For this pair of connected hexagons, describe the connection between them. In 5-7 sentences, explain how one concept relates to the other. Is it a cause-and-effect relationship? Are they part of the same historical event or process? Do they share common characteristics or themes? Refer back to specific events, individuals, or historical developments to support your explanation.

1 answer

To respond to your question effectively, let's first establish an overview of the key concepts within the context of Colonial Society and Revolution. Imagine "Connection #1" links two hexagons representing a social or political aspect of colonial life and potentially an event or ideology leading up to the American Revolution.

For example, if one hexagon represents "Mercantilism" and the other "Colonial Discontent," the connection could be explored as follows: Mercantilism, the economic policy enforced by Britain to control colonial trade for its benefit, significantly contributed to the growing discontent among colonists. Under this system, colonies were expected to supply raw materials to the mother country and purchase British goods, limiting their economic autonomy. This imbalance fostered resentment, as colonists felt exploited and restricted in their economic opportunities. Events like the Navigation Acts exemplified this tension, as they enforced strict control over colonial trade. The resulting frustration and desire for economic freedom laid the groundwork for revolutionary thoughts and actions. Thus, this connection illustrates a cause-and-effect relationship where mercantilism spurred discontent, ultimately leading to the revolutionary sentiments that fueled the push for independence.

In summary, the connection between these hexagons captures an essential aspect of the historical process leading to the American Revolution, highlighting the socio-economic factors that played a critical role in shaping colonial attitudes and actions against British rule.