Respond in a paragraph and make sure your answer is written in complete sentences.
Write a fully developed paragraph that contrasts the effects of war in two of the following works: "Cranes," "Thoughts of Hanoi," and "Tokyo."
3 answers
The effects of war are explored in different ways in the literary works "Cranes" and "Tokyo." In "Cranes," the story focuses on the relationship between two childhood friends who are now on opposite sides of the Korean War. The war has forced them to choose between their loyalty to their country or their personal friendship. The story highlights the impact of war on human relationships and the emotional toll it takes on individuals. On the other hand, "Tokyo" portrays the aftermath of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. The devastation caused by the bomb is described in detail, depicting the physical destruction and loss of life caused by war. Through the characters' experiences, the story shows how war can leave lasting scars on individuals and entire cities. While "Cranes" emphasizes the impact of war on relationships, "Tokyo" emphasizes the physical devastation of war.
Respond in a paragraph and make sure your answer is written in complete sentences.
Describe the character of the professor in "Saboteur." Give at least three details from the story to support your description.
Describe the character of the professor in "Saboteur." Give at least three details from the story to support your description.
In "Saboteur," the professor is depicted as a manipulative and deceptive character. Firstly, he abuses his power as a respected academic by falsely accusing the police of harassing him, allowing him to avoid punishment for his actions. Secondly, he is not afraid to use his wife's health as a tool for his own gain, manipulating her into giving him the medicine he needs to recover from his confinement at the police station. Lastly, his true intentions are revealed at the end when he admits to not being a victim of injustice but a saboteur who purposely spread his illness to infect innocent people as an act of revenge against the corrupt political system. Overall, the character of the professor is portrayed as deceptive, manipulative, and with a strong desire for revenge.