Thank you for your positive feedback, Dr. Shawn! I appreciate your acknowledgment of the low plagiarism score.
The primary reasons for this low score include:
-
Original Thought and Analysis: The work incorporates a significant amount of original analysis and perspective. This was achieved by synthesizing information from various sources while adding my unique insights and interpretations.
-
Proper Citation Practices: Throughout the paper, I ensured to properly cite all sources used, adhering to academic standards for referencing. This not only gives credit to the original authors but also clearly distinguishes my ideas from those of others.
-
Paraphrasing and Summarization: Where external ideas were incorporated, I placed emphasis on paraphrasing and summarizing information rather than directly quoting it. By doing so, I was able to convey the essence of the original content while maintaining my voice.
-
Focus on Primary Research: I relied heavily on primary research and data, which allowed me to present findings that are less likely to be replicated in existing literature. This added to the originality of my contribution.
-
Awareness and Tools: Before submission, I utilized plagiarism detection tools to ensure that any unintended similarities were addressed. This proactive approach contributed to the low similarity index.
Overall, the combination of these factors has contributed to a work that is both scholarly and original, minimizing the risk of plagiarism. Thank you again for the recognition; I look forward to continuing to enhance the quality of my research!
1 answer