1) Which sources did the program rely on for information, and were they considered trustworthy and credible?
2) Did the program provide a balanced presentation by including conflicting viewpoints, or did it only present one perspective?
3) Was the accuracy of the information in the program confirmed through fact-checking by independent sources or organizations?
rephrase this
1) What sources did the program use to gather information? Were they reliable and credible sources?
2) Were any opposing viewpoints or perspectives presented in the program, or was it one-sided?
3) Was the information presented in the program fact-checked or verified by independent sources or organizations?
1 answer