rephrase like a 8th grader

Text 4: On lines 20-25, there is an opposition to the restoration of extinct species based on a discussion of plausible harm to the environment. Resurrected animals may become a nuisance, new ecosystems invaders, or even cause a potential outbreak of new viruses. This may result in damage to nature as well as to our health. Besides, the text points to the fact that we need to spend our limited resources on solving real problems inducing extinction, such as destruction of habitats and over-exploitation of resources, not chasing after de-extinction projects in which success is uncertain (lines 5-10).

(the leave quotes the same)

1 answer

Text 4: In lines 20-25, the text talks about why bringing back extinct species might not be a good idea. It says that these animals could turn out to be a bother, invade new ecosystems, or even spread new viruses. This could harm nature and our health. Plus, the text points out that we should use our limited resources to tackle real problems that cause extinction, like destroying habitats and taking too much from nature, instead of trying to bring back extinct species, which might not even work (lines 5-10).

Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 3 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. rephrase like a 8th graderText 4 (lines 20-25) further argues against de-extinction by pointing out its potential ecological
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. rephrase like a 8th graderAccording to Text 3 (lines 16-20), bringing back species like the Pyrenean ibex involves exorbitant
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions