Read this to answer the question:

In lord of the flies, the narrator provides an omniscient, drone’s-eye view of the boys on the island. How does that choice by the author help to involve the reader in the developing story? How does it encourage the reader to sit in judgement of the characters?

Lapis’s answer was: the reader is given a more complex knowledge of the behaviors and moral quandaries of several characters by William Goulding use of an omniscient narrator, gives them insight into motivations feelings and thoughts this narrative technique, evokes, both empathy and criticism by highlighting the differences between the boys and civilized instincts and primitive drives, allowing readers to watch and evaluate. The boys decline in savory as a result the reader is in a position to consider the larger issues of mankind civilization, and the human evil side, encouraging a critical analysis of the decisions made by each character and ensuing effects.

Lapis is missing textual support. What is one quote or great example to make her point?

1 answer

One quote that could support Lapis's point about the omniscient narrator in "Lord of the Flies" is when the narrator describes the internal thoughts and feelings of the characters, such as Ralph's reflections on leadership and civilization. For instance, at one point, the narrator writes about Ralph's awareness of the boys' descent into savagery:

"The conch exploded into a thousand white fragments and ceased to exist."

This moment signifies the complete breakdown of order and civilization among the boys. The omniscient perspective allows the reader to grasp Ralph's realization of the loss of control and the implications of the boys' actions. It evokes a sense of empathy for Ralph as he struggles to maintain order, while also inviting criticism of the other boys who succumb to their primal instincts. By providing insight into the characters’ motivations and escalating tensions, the omniscient narration encourages readers to judge their actions and contemplate the themes of civilization versus savagery in a more profound way.