The bolded sentence, "In fact, his talent was well recognized by those acquainted with him," should be removed because it does not contribute significant information to the overall understanding of Walsingham's spy network or its historical context. It is somewhat redundant, as the preceding sentence already establishes that Walsingham was extremely good at his job. The mention of his talent being recognized by others does not add any new insights or details pertinent to the main narrative about the effectiveness and impact of his espionage work during a critical time in Elizabeth I's reign. Removing this sentence would streamline the paragraph and maintain focus on the key facts regarding Walsingham's accomplishments.
Read this paragraph about Sir Francis Walsingham's spy network.
During her reign in the late 1500s, Queen Elizabeth I of England was under constant threat from people who wanted to remove her from power, including her cousin Mary. To protect herself, Elizabeth enlisted the help of her principal advisor, Sir Francis Walsingham. He soon set to work establishing a network of spies to gather information about the queen's opponents. According to accounts from people who knew him, Walsingham was extremely good at his job. In fact, his talent was well recognized by those acquainted with him. Walsingham's most significant contribution came in 1586, when he and his spies decoded secret messages between Mary and her supporters about a plot to overthrow the queen. As a result of the spies' efforts, Elizabeth had Mary and her accomplices arrested.
Why should the bolded sentence be removed?
1 answer