Read the paragraph from “Solar-Powered Public Buildings? Not So Fast, California!”

Rather, California actually pays those other states to take its extra solar electricity (Penn). That’s right. California—and Californians—give other states money to take the solar electricity that California—and Californians—paid to create. Getting rid of excess power costs the state more cash!

A student wants to explain why California must pay other states to take its excess power.

Which paragraph from “Too Much of a Good Thing?” could best be combined with the information from “Solar-Powered Public Buildings? Not So Fast, California!” to achieve this?

Responses

Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1

Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2

Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3

Paragraph 4

1 answer

To provide an accurate response about which paragraph from "Too Much of a Good Thing?" best complements the information about California's excess solar electricity payments, I would need to review the specific paragraphs mentioned in that document. Since I don’t have access to the text of "Too Much of a Good Thing?", I can suggest focusing on a paragraph that discusses California's energy production, the challenges of energy surplus, or economic implications related to energy transactions. Look for information that elaborates on why California produces excess energy or the financial effects of managing this surplus. If you provide me the text of the paragraphs in question, I can help determine the most suitable one to combine.

Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. Part AThe author’s purpose in “Solar-Powered Public Buildings? Not So Fast, California!” is to convince readers that
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Part AHow does the author of “Solar-Powered Public Buildings? Not So Fast, California!” support the claim that increasing
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions