The Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington D.C. has sparked debate over whether it is an appropriate tribute to the veterans of the Vietnam War. Supporters of the memorial argue that its reflective design and listing of the names of fallen soldiers create a powerful homage to those who served. However, critics feel that the memorial is too minimalist and does not adequately honor the sacrifices of the veterans. By synthesizing multiple sources, it becomes clear that the Vietnam Veterans Memorial is a complex symbol that can be interpreted differently depending on one's perspective.
Source A, "A Vietnam Memorial and a Few Ironies" by B. Drummond Ayers, offers a perspective that supports the Vietnam Veterans Memorial as an appropriate tribute. Ayers argues that the memorial's design encourages visitors to reflect on the human cost of the war and the individual sacrifices made by each soldier. This interpretation aligns with the idea that the reflective quality of the monument pays tribute to the complexity of the Vietnam War.
On the other hand, Source C, "Insulting Vietnam Vets" by Tom Carhart, presents a contrasting view that the Vietnam Veterans Memorial is not an appropriate tribute. Carhart criticizes the memorial as a "black, tomb-like hole" that dishonors the survivors of the war. This perspective emphasizes the minimalist design of the memorial and suggests that it fails to adequately honor the veterans.
Source B, "The Vietnam Memorial" by Maya Ling Yin, provides insight into the intention behind the design of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Yin explains that the memorial was meant to be a place for healing and reconciliation, where visitors could come together to remember the war's impact. This source supports the idea that the memorial serves as a meaningful tribute to the veterans by creating a space for reflection and remembrance.
In conclusion, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington D.C. is a complex symbol that elicits differing opinions on its appropriateness as a tribute to the veterans of the Vietnam War. While some view the reflective design and listing of names as a powerful homage, others criticize the minimalist approach as insufficient. By considering multiple perspectives, it becomes clear that the memorial's significance lies in its ability to provoke contemplation and remembrance of the war's impact on individuals and society as a whole.
Read the Introduction and questions and write a synthesis essay of 5 paragraphs don't just answer the question
Introduction:
The Vietnam Conflict was arguably the most contentious in American History The Vietnam Veterans Memorial, located on the National Mall in Washington DC., was also a contentious choice. A wild departure from the tall monuments of other wars, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial is an intersection of two reflective walls set below the ground. The walls list the names of the Americans who died in the conflict. Some have referred to the monument as a black, tomb-like hole that dishonors the survivors of the Vietnam War. Others feel that the reflective quality of the monument coupled with the park-like setting around it pays evocative tribute to a complex moment in American history.
Read the following sources (including any introductory information) carefully. Then write a synthesis essay in which you evaluate whether or not the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C is an appropriate tribute to the Vietnam veterans
Refer to the sources by their titles (Source A, Source B, etc.) or by the descriptions
Source A (Ayers)
Source B (Lin)
Source C (Carhart)
Source D (Remembering)
Source E (Corbitt)
Sources:
A. YALE SENIOR, A VIETNAM MEMORIAL AND A FEW IRONTES, by B. Drummond
B. THE VIETNAM MEMORIAL by Maya Ling Yin
C. INSULTING VIETNAM VETS, by Tom Carhart
D. HOW TO REMEMBER VIL INAM
E HONORING VETERANS OF WAR AND ANTI-WAR by Phyllis S. Corbitt
Keep the following questions in mind and make sure to answer them in your essay
What is the prompt asking you to take a position on, what is it asking you to do. After reading the background info, what is your gut opinion on which side you want to take. Go with one. Which sources support your position. Make an indication so you can come back to those later. Which sources seem to run counter to your position. Pick at least one of these to read for your counter-argument. As you are reading, be on the lookout for anything (quotes) you can use in your paper later Mark them so you can find them as you are writing. What are some overarching themes you notice in the works you read. How can you use these themes to group the sources you read. How will you combine them. You will need to use 3 sources overall, but please don't use more than 4 (for time purposes). Yes, this means you can use a source twice For example, if you have talked about Source A and Source B in the first paragraph, you can then talk about Source B and Source E in the second paragraph. You MUST have more than one source per body paragraph. Make a brief outline and pick pertinent quotes from your sources if you haven't yet
1 answer