The quote should be directly quoted because it is a legal document. Directly quoting the ruling from Brown v. Board of Education emphasizes the authority and significance of the Supreme Court's decision. It maintains the original language and intent of the court, which is crucial when discussing legal matters and the implications of the ruling on educational equality. Additionally, quoting directly provides a robust basis for analysis and discussion in your essay, allowing readers to engage with the precise language used by the court.
Read the following quote: We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? We believe that it does. – Supreme Court of the United States, Brown v. Board of Education decision. You are writing an essay on the Supreme Court ruling that declared school segregation unconstitutional. Should this quote be paraphrased or directly quoted, and why? It should be directly quoted because the Supreme Court is an expert source. It should be paraphrased because you can sum the ruling up in fewer words. It should be directly quoted because it is a legal document. It should be paraphrased to avoid copyright violation.
1 answer