The black men of America have a duty to perform, a duty stern and delicate,—a forward movement to oppose a part of the work of their greatest leader. So far as Mr. Washington preaches Thrift, Patience, and Industrial Training for the masses, we must hold up his hands and strive with him, rejoicing in his honors and glorying in the strength of this Joshua called of God and of man to lead the headless host. But so far as Mr. Washington apologizes for injustice, North or South, does not rightly value the privilege and duty of voting, belittles the emasculating effects of caste distinctions, and opposes the higher training and ambition of our brighter minds,—so far as he, the South, or the Nation, does this,—we must unceasingly and firmly oppose them.
Which statement best explains why this argument is valid?
Du Bois shows how Washington is a great inspirational leader.
Du Bois explains that Washington’s points need to be opposed.
It supports the claim that Black men have a duty to support Washington.
It describes why not all of Washington’s arguments are worthy of support.
1 answer
The statement that best explains why this argument is valid is:
It describes why not all of Washington’s arguments are worthy of support.
Du Bois acknowledges Washington's positive contributions while simultaneously critiquing specific aspects of his philosophy that he believes are harmful or insufficient for the progress of Black men in America.
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer