The correct response is:
No, only about one tenth of the 235U would have decayed after 65.5 million years, not leaving enough to measure in the fossils.
Uranium-235 has a very long half-life (704 million years), and since dinosaurs went extinct approximately 65.5 million years ago, the amount of uranium-235 that would have decayed during that time would be minimal. After 65.5 million years, only about 9% (or roughly one-tenth) of the original amount would have decayed, which may not be sufficient for accurate measurement and dating in fossils. Therefore, uranium-235 is not suitable for dating dinosaur fossils. Other methods, such as carbon-14 dating, are more applicable for more recent specimens, but even that has limitations due to its half-life of 5,730 years.