To rewrite \( 40\sqrt[3]{3} \) as a product of an integer and another irrational cube root, we first need to factor \( 40 \) in a way that separates an integer and the remaining part under the cube root.
The number \( 40 \) can be factored as:
\[ 40 = 8 \times 5 \]
Now, we know that \( 8 \) is a perfect cube (since \( 8 = 2^3 \)). Thus, we can rewrite:
\[ 40\sqrt[3]{3} = (8)\sqrt[3]{5}\sqrt[3]{3} \]
This simplifies to:
\[ = 2^3 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15} \] \[ = 2\sqrt[3]{8 \cdot 5 \cdot 3} = 2\sqrt[3]{120} \]
However, we want it in a more suitable form. Since \( 40 = 8 \cdot 5 \), we can rewrite:
\[ 40\sqrt[3]{3} = 2\sqrt[3]{8} \cdot \sqrt[3]{5} \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} = 2 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15 \cdot 3} = 2\sqrt[3]{15} \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} \]
Thus, your expression is presented as:
\[ = 2\sqrt[3]{40} \]
Thus, writing it as the form requested we can say:
The closest option to the derived answer is:
- \( 2\sqrt[3]{15} \)
However, it's not in your option, since let's review the options presented:
- \( -25\sqrt[3]{3} \)
- \( 2\sqrt[3]{5} \)
- \( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \)
- \( 85\sqrt[3]{3} \)
Since none perfectly match \( \sqrt[3]{5} \) we are presented closest to \( 2\sqrt[3]{40} \).
So we take the best fitting which would be:
\[ 2\sqrt[3]{15} \]
If we take the view of forms generally the response seems like \( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \), in this analytical frame remains to reason what would specifically return on insights of \( 2\sqrt[3]{3} \).