To find the point corresponding to the number of pairs of jeans Talia purchased, we need to examine the cost associated with the jeans, which are priced at $15 each.
The graph provides the following points:
- A: (1, 25) - This corresponds to buying 1 item for $25 (which is not jeans).
- B: (2, 30) - This corresponds to buying 2 items for $30 (which cannot be jeans at $15 each since that would imply buying 2 items for $30).
- C: (2, 20) - This corresponds to buying 2 items for $20 (which also cannot be jeans).
- D: (4, 20) - This corresponds to buying 4 items for $20 (which aligns with buying a quantity of jeans since 4 pairs of jeans would cost $60, not $20).
From the pricing, we can determine that Talia cannot correspond with any of the points A, B, C, or D for jeans based on the prices mentioned. However, if we check the situation again with the provided prices and link to points correctly:
For 0 items, the price would be $0. For 1 item (T-shirt): $5 For 2 items (T-shirts or other): $10 (long sleeve) or $15(jeans). For 2 items at the cost of $20, it fits within a misalignment.
Thus, **the orders of points will not correspond to jeans purchased with proper pricing. **
If we rely more on purchasing jeans factored into the chart:
- **The best option available for a price listing of jeans would suggest that point B would best correspond due to its wider interpretation. **
In conclusion, without a direct correlation across jeans pricing with the graph, if we determined point selection, I will select point B as fitting jeans choice and cost factors indirectly.
So, the answer regarding jeans Talia purchased corresponds best here given boundaries: B.