Question

Question

Lenny wrote a paragraph proof of the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem. What mistake did Lenny make in his proof?

HK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
is a perpendicular bisector of IJ¯¯¯¯¯¯
, and L is the midpoint of IJ¯¯¯¯¯¯
. M is a point on the perpendicular bisector, HK¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
. By the definition of a perpendicular bisector, I know that IM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
. By the definition of a perpendicular bisector, I also know that ∠MLI
and ∠MLJ
are right angles. ∠MLI≅∠MLJ because of the Right Angle Congruence Theorem. I can also say that ML¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅ML¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
by the Reflexive Property of Congruence. With this information, I know that △MLI≅△MLJ
by the SAS Congruence Theorem. Since the triangles are congruent, the CPCTC Theorem allows me to know that IL¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JL¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
. Knowing that these segments are congruent proves the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem.

(1 point)
Responses

The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that IL¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JL¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
, not that IM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
.
The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that line segment cap i liters is congruent to line segment cap j liters, not that line segment cap i cap m is congruent to line segment cap j cap m.

The SAS Congruence Theorem tells you that △MLI≅△JLM
, not that △MLI≅△MLJ
.
The SAS Congruence Theorem tells you that △MLI≅△JLM
, not that △MLI≅△MLJ
.

The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that∠LMI
and ∠LMJ
are right angles, not that ∠MLI
and ∠MLJ
are right angles.
The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that ∠LMI
and ∠LMJ
are right angles, not that ∠MLI
and ∠MLJ
are right angles.

Lenny did not make a mistake. His proof is correct.
Lenny did not make a mistake. His proof is correct.
Skip to navigation

Answer 1

Lenny made the mistake in stating that "By the definition of a perpendicular bisector, I know that IM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯."

The definition of a perpendicular bisector actually tells you that I (point I) is congruent to J (point J) in relation to their respective distances to any point on the bisector, not specifically that IM is congruent to JM. Therefore, the correct response highlighting this mistake is:

The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that line segment IL is congruent to line segment JL, not that line segment IM is congruent to line segment JM.