To determine which expression is equivalent to \(30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m)\) using the Associative Property, we can rearrange the terms and group them differently.
First, let's simplify the original expression step by step:
-
Start with the original expression: \[ 30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m) \]
-
Remove the parentheses: \[ 30m + 21m - 53 + 18 - 2m \]
-
Combine like terms:
- Combine the \(m\) terms: \(30m + 21m - 2m = 49m\)
- Combine the constant terms: \(-53 + 18 = -35\)
Thus, we have: \[ 49m - 35 \]
Now, we can examine the response options to find the one that matches \(49m - 35\).
The option that corresponds to this result is: 53m - 35 (as that does not match). (49m - 53) + 16 would imply further adjustment is needed since \(49m - 53\) does not match. (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) matches as it shows the grouping of \(30m\) and \(21m\) plus the last term. 51m + (-53 + 18) - 2m leads to a discrepancy in \(m\) terms.
Therefore, the correct equivalent expression using the Associative Property is: \[ (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \]
Thus, the correct answer is: (30 m + 21 m) + (18 - 2 m).