Question 10
A) The triangles can be proven congruent using AAS in the parallelogram ABCD.
Question 11
A) Wyatt is correct. They are congruent by the HL Congruence Theorem (Hypotenuse-Leg) because both have a right angle, and the legs are congruent.
Question 12
A) Given the congruence △ABC ≅ △CDA:
- AD = 85
- CD = 84
Question 13
A) The transformations needed to show that △ABC≅△EFD are:
- Translation
- Rotation
B) This justifies the SSS (Side-Side-Side) congruence theorem or could be seen as a combination of transformations leading to congruence, typically referencing side lengths.
Question 14
A) The two transformations needed to show that the triangles are congruent are:
- Reflection
- Translation
B) This justifies the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) congruency theorem.
Question 15
Part 1: To prove the two triangles congruent, you can apply the Triangle Sum Theorem. For Triangle XYZ, you can calculate the third angle:
- The measure of angle Y can be found as follows: \(180 - (87 + 57) = 36\) degrees. So the angles in Triangle XYZ are 87 degrees, 57 degrees, and 36 degrees. The angles in Triangle DAB are provided as \( <D = 36 \), \( <B = 57 \). Using the AAS congruency theorem, where two angles and the included side are congruent, if we establish that these angles correspond to the angles in Triangle DAB, we can conclude the triangles are congruent.
Part 2: The correct congruency statement is: \( \triangle XYZ = \triangle DAB \).