Both methods of constructing an equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle start with drawing a circle, which is the key element in both techniques. In my method from Question 1, I used the circle's center and divided it into three equal parts by marking off points on the circumference. This involves a combination of arcs and angles to ensure all sides are the same length. On the other hand, Megan's method uses a diameter to find points on the circle. She then creates another circle to find the necessary points for the triangle.
The main difference lies in how we find those points: I specifically used angles, while Megan employed another circle based on the radius. I prefer my method because it feels more direct and uses fewer steps, making it easier to visualize the triangle's symmetry. However, both methods effectively achieve the same result, and it's interesting to see different approaches to the same geometric problem.