Question 1: The option that is NOT a reason to engage in counter-arguments is:
- To reveal the weaknesses of one's position
Question 2: Paine's writings are effective because they appeal to both:
- reason and emotion
One of Thomas Paine's rhetorical strengthens is his ability to acknowledge and refute counterarguments. Which of the following is NOT a reason to engage in counter-arguments?
Question 1 options:
To engage in a good faith argument
To reveal the weaknesses of the opponent's position
To reveal the weaknesses of one's position
To show the writer has considered the main points of the opponent's position
Question 2 (1 point)
Paine's writings are effective because they appeal to both -
Question 2 options:
faith and fear
emotion and faith
reason and emotion
fear and anger
1 answer
Question 1: The option that is NOT a reason to engage in counter-arguments is:
Question 2: Paine's writings are effective because they appeal to both: