To determine if quadrilateral QRST is a parallelogram, we can use the fact that the sum of the angles in any quadrilateral is 360°. Given that the measure of angle Q is 108° and angle R is \(108 - 2x\), we can express the angles S and T, which we do not know yet, as follows:
The sum of angles Q, R, S, and T is: \[ 108 + (108 - 2x) + S + T = 360 \] This simplifies to: \[ 216 - 2x + S + T = 360 \] From this, we get: \[ S + T = 360 - 216 + 2x = 144 + 2x \]
For QRST to be a parallelogram, opposite angles must be equal, which means angle Q must equal angle S and angle R must equal angle T. However, we do not have information to define angles S and T directly. Thus, we can proceed further only if we assume a relationship or if more information is provided.
Let's analyze how to solve this problem as a part of evaluating quadrilateral properties instead: if we assume that opposite angles must be supplementary (if QRST were to be a cyclic quadrilateral), then: \[ S + Q = 180 \quad \rightarrow \quad S = 180 - 108 = 72 \] and \[ T + R = 180 \quad \rightarrow \quad T = 180 - (108 - 2x) = 72 + 2x \]
Setting the equations equal for S and T from our earlier relationship gives: \[ 72 + 2x = S + T = 144 + 2x \] This leads to no contradictions when we complete the equations indicating a cyclic relationship which does imply more about our parallelogram's legitimacy. However, calculating exact angles will give you \(x = 36\) to make R supplementary to T and can be verified since total angles evade contradiction despite pairly oppositional needs.
Thus, unable to confirm definite conditions of opposite equal measures but accepted that quadrilateral must exist, leading to the value \(x = 36\).