In this part, Juliet says that a name doesn't really show who someone is. She uses the example of a rose, explaining that no matter what it's called, it still smells sweet. Similarly, if Romeo had a different name, he would still be the same person. This means that names and family labels don’t matter as much as a person’s true qualities. Juliet's thoughts show that love is more important than social labels or identities.
Put the text below into simpler words
In this passage, Juliet argues that a name does not define the essence of a person or thing, using the analogy of a rose. She suggests that regardless of what a rose is called, its sweet fragrance remains unchanged, just as Romeo's true nature would not be altered if he were called something else. This implies that social labels and family names are insignificant compared to the qualities and character of an individual. Juliet's reflection highlights the theme that love transcends societal constructs and identities.
1 answer
1 answer